Capcom is at it again, this time with Devil May Cry 5. Unlike Resident Evil 2 this one isn’t a reboot but a full fledged follow up to a very popular series. In this one we’ll be looking Devil May Cry 5 PC performance and thanks to the fact that it’s running the excellent Reach for the Moon Engine (RE Engine), that Capcom has been capitalizing well off of since the launch of Resident Evil 7, we have a pretty good indicator of what to expect with the results in this one.
Testing Methodology
Testing this game was more than a little bit challenging. Not because it lacks a benchmark utility, that’s something that is easy to work around with a little bit of planning, but rather the swing in performance through scenes. Reminiscent of Metro Exodus where framerates can go from over 100 to below 60 by simply looking the wrong way. The game also performs very differently based on which area of the game you’re in. But the biggest monkey wrench in the whole thing comes in two forms; multiple variable settings and whether the game decides it wants to launch in DX11 or DX12. For our testing we took our results from the main intro cutscene which uses the game engine and we allow it to run the course from the moment the Capcom logo disappears to the time that the van crashes or roughly 222 seconds. Settings wise we used the highest settings available UNLESS they were variable, the settings that are set to OFF were those which only allowed for variable settings and due to the very nature of variability, we left them disabled to maintain consistency. The API debate is an interesting one here as the game game supports DX12 but features a fallback to DX11, more often than not it launched in DX11 for us so we set that to the target API. There is not an option in the game to do this so you’ll have to rely on the .ini file. But another thing to take note is that even in the scene we used the frame rate varied wildly and resulted in a pretty wide disparity between averages and 1% minimums so evidences of stutter will need to be seen in the spread from 1% and .1% minimums. And much like the results Metro Exodus the performance metrics here can be used to have an expectation of performance with it often higher and lower but is a good indicator of performance variation between CPU cores, API, and graphics cards.
Devil May Cry 5 Settings
| Graphics Setting | Settings Used |
|---|---|
| Frame Rate | Variable |
| V-Sync | OFF |
| Rendering Method | Normal |
| Resolution Scaling | 100% |
| Texture Quality | Ultra |
| Texture Filtering Quality | Ultra |
| Mesh Quality | Ultra |
| Anti-aliasing | FXAA+TAA |
| Motion Blur | OFF |
| Effect Quality | High |
| Shadow Quality | Ultra |
| Shadow Cache | ON |
| Ambient Occlusion Type | OFF |
| Bloom | On |
| Lens Flare | ON |
| Volumetric Light Quality | High |
| Sceen Space Reflections | OFF |
| Subsurface Scattering | OFF |
| Chromatic Aberration | ON |
| Color Range | SRGB |
Test System
| Components | Z370 |
|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core i9-9900k @ 5GHz |
| Memory | 16GB G.Skill Trident Z DDR4 3200 |
| Motherboard | EVGA Z370 Classified K |
| Storage | Crucial P1 1TB NVMe SSD |
| PSU | Cooler Master V1200 Platinum |
Graphics Cards Tested
| GPU | Architecture | Core Count |
Clock Speed | Memory Capacity |
Memory Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA RTX 2080ti | Turing | 4352 | 1350/1635 | 11GB GDDR6 | 14Gbps |
| NVIDIA RTX 2080 FE | Turing | 2944 | 1515/1800 | 8GB GDDR6 | 14Gbps |
| NVIDIA RTX 2070 FE | Turing | 2304 | 1410/1710 | 8GB GDDR6 | 14Gbps |
| NVIDIA RTX 2060 FE | Turing | 1904 | 1365/168 | 6GB GDDR6 | 14Gbps |
| NVIDIA GTX 1080 FE | Pascal |
2560 | 1607/1733 | 8GB GDDR5X | 10Gbps |
| NVIDIA GTX 1070 FE | Pascal |
1920 | 1506/1683 | 8GB GDDR5 | 8Gbps |
| NVIDIA GTX 1060 FE 6GB | Pascal |
1280 |
1506/1708 | 6GB GDDR5 | 8Gbps |
| XLR8 GTX 1060 3GB | Pascal | 1152 | 1506/1708 | 3GB GDDR5 | 8Gbps |
| AMD RX Vega 64 | Vega 10 | 4096 | 1247/1546 | 8GB HBM2 | 945Mbps |
| AMD RX Vega 56 | Vega 10 | 3584 | 1156/1471 | 8GB HBM2 | 800Mbs |
| MSI RX 580 Armor 8GB | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1366 | 8GB GDDR5 | 8Gbps |
| Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 4GB | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1340 | 4GB GDDR5 | 7Gbps |
Drivers Used
| Drivers | |
|---|---|
| Radeon Settings | 19.3.1 |
| GeForce | 419.35 |
The Denuvo Debacle
There was an interesting run on the initial launch of Devil May Cry 5 where Capcom slipped up and let out the .exe for the game that allowed it to run without Denuvo kicking in. Some users reported up to 20 FPS improvements so we had to take a look into it ourselves. The video below shows side by sides of the game running with and without Denuvo and also shows the segment we used to capture our performance results from. Long and short of our testing as well as a few others we’ve reached out to we were hard pressed to find a difference in performance in this game but there is a clear indicator that the CPU load and memory load were different.
Intel Core Scaling Performance
Testing the performance the game has with different core and thread configurations is a good tool to help identify points of diminishing returns. This doesn’t necessarily show the load across cores and threads but you can see that once you hit 4 cores and 8 threads or 6 cores w/o Hyper Threading you gain very little. While Devil May Cry 5 makes use of the 4 core CPU with HT to stretch out you can clearly see that 6 cores is where it hits its stride and kinda stays there, but prefers no HT for optimal performance.
Graphics Card Results
1080p
Devil May Cry 5 shows good scaling at 1080p and is even able to deliver a great experience all the way down the stack. You can see at the upper end of the GPU stack you can see where performance start to become CPU constrained.
1440p
2560×1440 starts to separate the men from the boys as they say but even the lower end still manages to maintain a 60FPS average, but expect some harsh dips along the way. If you’re playing this one on a 144Hz VRR panel can expect a very smooth experience provided the VRR window is good and wide.
2160p/UDH 4k
This one surprised me a bit, seeing how many cards came right up and danced around the 4K 60FPS mark. Often I would say that adventure games are perfectly playable when running at least 30+ FPS this isn’t one of those kinds of games, more frames really make this action packed ride even better.
DX12 Performance
Seeing as how Devil May Cry 5 is DX 12 Compatible meant we at least had to take a quick look at it. After looking at this I can’t help but question the logic behind not allowing users to select which API they want to use and relying on some unknown to pick which one it launches with at launch. While we have tested above with DX11 after running this I would recommend that Radeon owners extract a little extra performance by forcing DX12.
Conclusion
The wrap up here is much like it was with Resident Evil 2 and that makes me very happy. There’s not much better than when a new PC game launch goes well with the game and the performance. I don’t feel like there’s much in the way of recommendations and suggestions as pretty much everyone should be able to get into this one. My only real regret with this one is that Devuno is present and kept me from being able to go back retest everything with DX12 as well and having the time to break out the Ryzen 5 2400G and seeing how the Vega 11 handles this one.
The post Devil May Cry 5 PC Performance Explored by Keith May appeared first on Wccftech.
Refference- https://wccftech.com
0 Comments